According to the second story; the boy had a habit of teasing her.
Also, they read her Miranda Rights in English (which she has some troubles with and probably more when she is stressed).
If you accept that while she does know some English, she thinks in Spanish; having the cops restrain her, cuff her, and put her on the ground would probably drive all the English out of her brain (heck, with some people for whom English is their native tongue it does the same thing). If someone came up behind a person and grabbed them, the normal reaction is to fight.
Supposedly the rock that the cops are showing is NOT the 'weapon' according to BOTH kids.
I didn't say that she shouldn't be punished. I said that calling it a felony and assault with a lethal weapon was wrong and went under the ZT label. If she had pulled a gun; things would be different. 11 is old enough to know that guns are lethal. However, for me, there are some differences between an 11 year old pulling a gun and an 20 year old pulling a gun BOTH of which are MUCH more serious than a 5 year old pulling a gun (not that that wouldn't scare the bejeebers out of me anyway).
Regarding Bennett the WTOP article says that she is the defense attorney the other URL says that someone else is the girl's attorney so I don't know what to think about that.
I firmly believe that she should be punished. I also believe that if the boy did water bomb her and tease her; he should be punished. I fully believe that *IF* he threw the rock first; he should receive at least as harsh a punishment as she does (though proving that will be virtually impossible).t
no subject
Also, they read her Miranda Rights in English (which she has some troubles with and probably more when she is stressed).
If you accept that while she does know some English, she thinks in Spanish; having the cops restrain her, cuff her, and put her on the ground would probably drive all the English out of her brain (heck, with some people for whom English is their native tongue it does the same thing). If someone came up behind a person and grabbed them, the normal reaction is to fight.
Supposedly the rock that the cops are showing is NOT the 'weapon' according to BOTH kids.
I didn't say that she shouldn't be punished. I said that calling it a felony and assault with a lethal weapon was wrong and went under the ZT label. If she had pulled a gun; things would be different. 11 is old enough to know that guns are lethal. However, for me, there are some differences between an 11 year old pulling a gun and an 20 year old pulling a gun BOTH of which are MUCH more serious than a 5 year old pulling a gun (not that that wouldn't scare the bejeebers out of me anyway).
Regarding Bennett the WTOP article says that she is the defense attorney the other URL says that someone else is the girl's attorney so I don't know what to think about that.
I firmly believe that she should be punished. I also believe that if the boy did water bomb her and tease her; he should be punished. I fully believe that *IF* he threw the rock first; he should receive at least as harsh a punishment as she does (though proving that will be virtually impossible).t