Jan. 5th, 2010

javasaurus: (Default)
According to this WTOP article, the DC government is suing AT&T. The district is claiming that funds on calling cards should be considered abandoned after three years of non-use, and should become property of the district.

The level of stupidity here is, well, stupid. If I have an emergency Visa cash card, or AT&T phone card, it's not abandoned just because I don't use it. It's sitting there, in my wallet. If AT&T charges fees after a year or two, that would upset me, but that's how the cards work, and I know that.

To make matters worse, there are laws being debated to make the cards never expire, and a delay on the fees -- these laws are good, but why are there laws being proposed to protect the longevity of these cards for the consumer, if the district is just going to confiscate the funds? Oooohhhh...I get it....

The article notes that similar suits have succeeded elsewhere related to gift cards.

How would the district determine which cards would have money going to the district? If you bought it there? If you live there?

Maybe next they'll start considering savings accounts as abandoned.

Profile

javasaurus: (Default)
javasaurus

June 2012

S M T W T F S
     12
3456 789
101112 13141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 10th, 2025 04:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios