javasaurus: (Default)
javasaurus ([personal profile] javasaurus) wrote2005-08-03 09:39 am

Assault with deadly weapon: Girl hits boy with rock.

An eleven-year-old girl hit a boy in the head with a two-pound rock. She is being charged with felony assault with a deadly weapon. Thoughts?

Here's the article from WTOPnews.com

[identity profile] javasaurus.livejournal.com 2005-08-03 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Supposedly the prosecution is making sure it will be a public issue. Though charged as a juvenile, the trial will be public, and the prosecution is not accepting a plea or admission of guilt to avoid a public trial.

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2005-08-03 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
i think you're missing my point on junenile trials -- even though the trial is fully public, the media (either by law or by tradition) never "names names" of any juvie charged or convicted. only when they are tried as an adult, and/or are an adult at the time of arrest (like the DC area sniper kid) will they be named...and putting a name to a crime increases its impact greatly.

[identity profile] javasaurus.livejournal.com 2005-08-03 02:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, I see your point. But it doesn't apply here. Her name is in the second paragraph of the article. Maribel Cuevas.

[identity profile] blueeowyn.livejournal.com 2005-08-03 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I read it as the defense not accepting any plea bargain that involves her admitting guilt. Bennett is the defense attorney.B

(Anonymous) 2005-08-03 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Oops! My mistake. That makes much more sense. (I originally mis-read it as the prosecution not accepting a guilty plea, I presumed for the sake of increasing public awareness.)

[identity profile] javasaurus.livejournal.com 2005-08-03 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
the above anon. was me -- didn't realize I wasn't logged in!