javasaurus (
javasaurus) wrote2005-08-03 09:39 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Assault with deadly weapon: Girl hits boy with rock.
An eleven-year-old girl hit a boy in the head with a two-pound rock. She is being charged with felony assault with a deadly weapon. Thoughts?
Here's the article from WTOPnews.com
Here's the article from WTOPnews.com
no subject
*maybe* it might be the thing to wake parents up and get them to actually be parents again...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2005-08-03 15:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
From the article:
FRESNO, Calif. (AP) - Advocates for an 11-year-old girl who was arrested on a deadly weapon charge for throwing a 2-pound rock during a water balloon fight say the charge in no way fits the crime.
From a Free Maribel! web site:
Fresno, CA: On April 29th, Maribel was playing on the sidewalk with her 6-year-old brother and other younger children, when boys rode by on their bikes. They started teasing her, calling her names and hitting her with water balloons. TTThe 11-year-old girl threw a rock to defend herself as neighborhood boys pelted her, hitting one hard enough to make him bleed. The boy admitted to officers that he started the fight and was quickly released from the hospital after getting his head stitched up. The boy's family stated they did not want to press charges.
This brings two issues to my mind: First, the degree to which HOW a news item is reported can sway the reader; and second, the question of how far do we expect a reasonable child to go to protect themself from bullies?
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The original TOP article implies that there was a consensual water balloon fight going on and she added a rock. The other bit you quoted in a comment says that she was playing with some younger kids and the boys rode by on bikes, started teasing her and pelting her. That gives an entirely different slant to the matter.
I also think that calling a 2lb rock a 'lethal weapon' is going a bit far. As LongLostLars mentioned, rings could be considered weapons using that sort of logic. Does that mean that I should check my rings if we fly anywhere? What about my keys? They could be weapons (and have been in the past) although I doubt they are lethel. What about a pair of steel toed boots? Or a roll of masking tape (you could tie someone up and suffocate them with enough tape I suspect)? Or????
I think this is ZeroTolerance stupidity.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2005-08-03 15:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Other people's children...
Don't have any answers on how to make it better, just my observations.
Re: Other people's children...
Re: Other people's children...
no subject
(no subject)