the problem with charging as a juvinile is that for the "protection" of the child, it all becomes hidden. as such, it serves no purpose as any sort of deterent or demonstration that such a crime will really be punished. only when charged as an adult does the rest of the community (and more importantly, the rest of the kids of the community *and their respective parents*) know that any such thing has happened. its not just "some kid", but its a kid with a name, with a family, with a potential perhaps now destroyed.
*maybe* it might be the thing to wake parents up and get them to actually be parents again...
Supposedly the prosecution is making sure it will be a public issue. Though charged as a juvenile, the trial will be public, and the prosecution is not accepting a plea or admission of guilt to avoid a public trial.
i think you're missing my point on junenile trials -- even though the trial is fully public, the media (either by law or by tradition) never "names names" of any juvie charged or convicted. only when they are tried as an adult, and/or are an adult at the time of arrest (like the DC area sniper kid) will they be named...and putting a name to a crime increases its impact greatly.
Oops! My mistake. That makes much more sense. (I originally mis-read it as the prosecution not accepting a guilty plea, I presumed for the sake of increasing public awareness.)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 01:53 pm (UTC)*maybe* it might be the thing to wake parents up and get them to actually be parents again...
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 03:13 pm (UTC)