javasaurus (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
javasaurus) wrote2007-08-23 03:03 pm
javasaurus) wrote2007-08-23 03:03 pm
(no subject)
Apparently, voting in Ohio is not necessarily anonymous.
According to this article you can obtain a list of who voted in what order, and you can obtain the list of votes, also in order. All you have to do is line up the two lists!
I suspect this will be used by Diebold (and others) as an argument for not keeping paper records.
According to this article you can obtain a list of who voted in what order, and you can obtain the list of votes, also in order. All you have to do is line up the two lists!
I suspect this will be used by Diebold (and others) as an argument for not keeping paper records.
or nevermind?
this sort of thing is used in legal challenges to point out that person X got away with voting but shouldn't - its how, after the fact, districts in Florida could mass-wipe votes from alleged felons even after they voted.