(no subject)
Aug. 23rd, 2007 03:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
javasaurusApparently, voting in Ohio is not necessarily anonymous.
According to this article you can obtain a list of who voted in what order, and you can obtain the list of votes, also in order. All you have to do is line up the two lists!
I suspect this will be used by Diebold (and others) as an argument for not keeping paper records.
According to this article you can obtain a list of who voted in what order, and you can obtain the list of votes, also in order. All you have to do is line up the two lists!
I suspect this will be used by Diebold (and others) as an argument for not keeping paper records.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
or nevermind?
Date: 2007-08-23 07:56 pm (UTC)this sort of thing is used in legal challenges to point out that person X got away with voting but shouldn't - its how, after the fact, districts in Florida could mass-wipe votes from alleged felons even after they voted.