traffic cameras as enforcement

[javasaurus]

News item on WTOP today:

Apparently a lot of people are upset about red-light and speeding cameras. Personally, I don't see the problem -- don't run red lights, and don't speed, and you don't get fined. But people are making the claim that the cameras are overly invasive, somehow invading privacy. What privacy? You're on a public road, in a situation where if a cop was there, he wouldn't be invading your privacy by pulling you over, right? So why is the camera more invasive than a cop?

What really got me was the woman they interviewed who said (I paraphrase): There are some laws where if they don't catch you, it shouldn't be illegal.
Well, lady, you were caught.

Sigh...

I know there are issues regarding who gets the money from the fines, and some other issues regarding administration of the cameras. But I just don't get why people feel they have the right to break certain laws.

Comments

Re:

[javasaurus.livejournal.com]

Your problem driver this morning really has issues. While I am in favor of obeying posted speed limits, etc., what the other driver did to you was arrogant, dangerous, and just plain stupid. We cannot take it upon ourselves to enforce the road laws (though I have cheered the "moving roadblock" of a protest group driving together in all but one beltway lanes at the speed limit to specifically protest the speed limit). It only causes a more dangerous, and angry situation for all. If he was going the speed limit, and keeping to his lane, then good for him. But the weaving thing made me go "grrr..." when I read it.